Site icon IELTS Deal

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1: Cambridge 8 Test 2; triple pie chart on UK school spending; with plan and model answer

A double or triple pie chart has become a common question in the recent IELTS exam, and so this Academic IELTS Task 1 post focuses on such kind of topic. We shall look at an example from Cambridge IELTS Series book 8 Test 2 where a triple pie chart on school spending is given. This post will help the IELTS candidates to plan on this kind of question and write a strong answer by maintaining all the regulations of writing task 1.

So, let’s take a look at the picture first.

Here is the question with the title.

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Plan for the writing:

Looking closely at the charts, we can see some interesting points which we can turn into a great plan.

Now, we look at a model answer prepared by an IELTS expert:

The three pie charts compare the out-goings of a school in the UK in three different years over a 20-year timeline.

It is clearly visible that teachers’ salaries dominated the school’s spending in all three years (1981, 1991 and 2001) whereas a contrasting scenario was observed in terms of insurance with the lowest expenditure each year.

In 1981, teachers’ salaries constituted the highest percentage of the school cost which was 40%. This figure jumped to 50% in 1991, but went down again by 5% in 2001. The share of outlays on other workers’ wages slightly declined over the 20-year period, from 28% of the allotment in 1981 to only 15% in the year 2001. Spending on insurance was only 2% of the total in 1981, but it developed by 6% in 2001. Furthermore, the percentages for resources and furniture/equipment oscillated. The share of resources was the maximum in 1991 at 20% whereas the percentage of expenditure on furniture and equipment reached the top in 2001, at 23%.

(167 words, band score 8.0)

Examiner’s review:

The word count is perfect and the key features are all covered. The response also contains a solid overview. Information and ideas are arranged coherently and perfectly flowed toward the end of the response. Cohesive devices are used effectively and there is a clear progression overall. The range of vocabulary is both adequate and appropriate and spelling is accurate with the use of less common vocabulary to justify a higher band. There is a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, used fairly accurately.

Click here for answer to a combined/mixed graph (pie chart and table on land degradation)

If you think the post is helpful, please follow and like us:
Exit mobile version